The N.C.A.A. argued that the payments were a threat to amateurism and that barring them did not violate the antitrust laws.
— Read on www.nytimes.com/2021/06/21/us/supreme-court-ncaa-student-athletes.html
The N.C.A.A. argued that the payments were a threat to amateurism and that barring them did not violate the antitrust laws.
— Read on www.nytimes.com/2021/06/21/us/supreme-court-ncaa-student-athletes.html